Initiated By
FINRA
Allegations
FINRA BY-LAWS ARTICLE V, SECTION 2(C), FINRA RULES 1122, 2010, 3270, NASD RULES 2110, 3030, 3050:
MCGUIRE CONVERTED A TOTAL OF APPROXIMATELY $95,000 FROM A FORMER CUSTOMER BY MISREPRESENTING THAT TWO PURPORTED INVESTMENTS OF $60,000 AND $35,000 WERE FOR THE PURCHASE OF PRODUCTS SIMILAR TO ANNUITIES AND ISSUED BY A COMPANY. IN FACT, THE COMPANY WAS A BUSINESS OWNED AND CONTROLLED BY MCGUIRE AND THE CHECKS PROVIDED BY THE CUSTOMER WERE DEPOSITED IN A BANK ACCOUNT THAT MCGUIRE CONTROLLED. THE FUNDS DEPOSITED WERE USED BY MCGUIRE TO PAY FOR PERSONAL EXPENSES AND TO BENEFIT HIS UNAPPROVED OUTSIDE BUSINESS. WHEN THE CUSTOMER ASKED TO WITHDRAW A PORTION OF HER $95,000 INVESTMENT, MCGUIRE DECLINED TO DO SO ADVISING HER THAT A WITHDRAWAL WOULD RESULT IN THE ASSESSMENT OF SEVERE FINANCIAL PENALTIES. IN RESPONSE TO FINRA INQUIRIES, MCGUIRE PROVIDED TO FINRA COPIES OF TWO DOCUMENTS, EACH ENTITLED LOAN AGREEMENT, IN WHICH HE FORGED OR CAUSED TO BE FORGED THE SIGNATURE OF THE CUSTOMER. MCGUIRE FAILED TO NOTIFY FOUR FINRA-REGULATED BROKER DEALER EMPLOYERS OF HIS ACTIVITIES RELATED TO THREE OUTSIDE BUSINESSES, INCLUDING HIS COMPANY. MCGUIRE ALSO FAILED TO MAKE WRITTEN NOTIFICATION TO VARIOUS FINRA-REGULATED BROKER DEALER EMPLOYERS OF TWO SECURITIES ACCOUNTS HE MAINTAINED - ONE IN HIS OWN NAME AND ONE IN HIS COMPANY'S NAME - AT OTHER BROKERAGE FIRMS. MCGUIRE ALSO WILLFULLY FAILED TO DISCLOSE UNSATISFIED STATE AND FEDERAL TAX LIENS ON HIS FORM U4.
Resolution
Decision
Bar
Bar (Permanent)
Registration Capacities Affected
All Capacities
Duration
Indefinite
Start Date
12/17/2015
Sanctions
Monetary Penalty other than Fines
Amount
$17,696.71
Sanctions
Restitution
Amount
$95,000.00
Sanctions
interest; The decision includes a finding that McGuire willfully failed to disclose a material fact on a Form U4, and that under Section 3(a)(39)(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Article III, Section 4 of the FINRA By-Laws, this omission make him subject to a statutory disqualification with respect to association with a member.
Regulator Statement
EXTENDED HEARING PANEL DECISION RENDERED NOVEMBER 3, 2014 WHEREIN MCGUIRE IS BARRED FROM ASSOCIATION WITH ANY FINRA MEMBER IN ANY CAPACITY, ORDERED TO PAY $95,000, PLUS INTEREST, IN RESTITUTION TO A CUSTOMER'S ESTATE, AND ORDERED TO PAY COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $16,500.03. THE SANCTIONS WERE BASED ON FINDINGS THAT MCGUIRE CONVERTED A CUSTOMER'S FUNDS. THE FINDINGS STATED THAT MCGUIRE TOOK $95,000 FROM A CUSTOMER UNDER FALSE PRETENSES, USED THE MONEY FOR HIS OWN PURPOSES, AND THEN, WHEN THE CUSTOMER REQUESTED THE MONEY BACK, REFUSED TO COMPLY WITH HER REQUEST. THE FINDINGS ALSO STATED THAT MCGUIRE FORGED OR CAUSED TO BE FORGED THE CUSTOMER'S SIGNATURES ON LOAN AGREEMENTS HE GENERATED AND COPIED, SUPPLIED TO FINRA, AND USED IN AN EFFORT TO SUPPORT HIS FALSE ASSERTIONS THAT THE CUSTOMER LOANED HIM MONEY. THE FINDINGS ALSO INCLUDED THAT MCGUIRE FAILED TO PROVIDE NOTICE OF THREE OUTSIDE BUSINESS ACTIVITIES TO HIS EMPLOYING FIRMS. FINRA FOUND THAT MCGUIRE FAILED TO INFORM THREE OF HIS FINRA-REGISTERED BROKER-DEALER EMPLOYERS OF THE EXISTENCE OF TWO BROKERAGE ACCOUNTS HELD AWAY FROM THOSE EMPLOYERS AND LIKEWISE FAILED TO INFORM THE BROKER-DEALERS HOLDING HIS ACCOUNTS OF HIS ASSOCIATION WITH HIS EMPLOYERS. FINRA ALSO FOUND THAT MCGUIRE WILLFULLY FAILED TO DISCLOSE TWO STATE TAX WARRANTS AND ONE FEDERAL TAX LIEN ON HIS FORM U4. ON NOVEMBER 28, 2014, MCGUIRE APPEALED THIS MATTER TO THE NATIONAL ADJUDICATORY COUNCIL (NAC) AND THE SANCTIONS ARE NOT IN EFFECT PENDING REVIEW. NAC DECISION RENDERED DECEMBER 17, 2015 WHEREIN THE NAC AFFIRMED THE FINDINGS AND SANCTIONS IMPOSED BY THE HEARING PANEL. THE NAC ORDERED APPEAL COSTS OF $1,196.38. THE BAR IS EFFECTIVE AS OF DECEMBER 17, 2015. THE DECISION IS FINAL AS OF JANUARY 19, 2016.
Broker Comment
IN RESPONSE TO THE ALLEGATIONS REGARDING FORGERY AND CONVERSION, RICHARD MCGUIRE PROVIDED ALL THE REQUESTED DOCUMENTATION AND OTHER RECORDS TO FINRA SHOWING THAT THE FUNDS WERE A BONA FIDE LOAN FROM A FAMILY FRIEND (THE CLAIMANT) AND NOT A SECURITIES PRODUCT SALE OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF INVESTMENT TO AN EXISTING CLIENT. THE CLAIMANT ACTUALLY APPROACHED MCGUIRE TO HELP HIM BY LENDING FUNDS AS A FAMILY FRIEND. WHEN MCGUIRE AGREED TO ACCEPT THE LOAN HE INSISTED ON PROTECTING BOTH PARTIES BY ENTERING INTO A FORMAL WRITTEN LOAN AGREEMENT, WHICH HAS BEEN PRODUCED TO FURTHER EVIDENCE NO WRONGDOING BY MCGUIRE. THE CLAIMANT'S CHECKS WERE USED BY MCGUIRE TO PAY DOWN DEBT AND WERE NEVER INTENDED TO BE USED IN A SECURITIES OR INVESTMENT TRANSACTION. THIS PERSONAL LOAN FROM THE CLAIMANT IS PAYABLE BACK TO THE CLAIMANT UNDER THE TERMS OF THE LOAN AGREEMENT AND WITH INTEREST. CLAIMANT'S ALLEGATIONS WERE MADE AFTER A FALLING OUT BETWEEN THEM THAT IS UNRELATED TO ANY INVESTMENT-RELATED MATTER, AFTER A FRIENDSHIP FOR OVER TWO YEARS AFTER THE PERSONAL LOAN WAS MADE. MCGUIRE'S OUTSIDE BUSINESS ACTIVITIES WERE ACCURATELY DISCLOSED TO HIS REGISTERED PRINCIPAL MANAGERS, WHO APPARENTLY DID NOT ARRANGE FOR THEM TO BE PROCESSED ON MCGUIRE'S CRD RECORDS. CREDIBLE DOCUMENTATION TO EVIDENCE THAT THESE DISCLOSURES BY MCGUIRE WERE MADE HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO FINRA. MCGUIRE DISCLOSED THE OUTSIDE BROKERAGE ACCOUNT TO HIS REGISTERED PRINCIPAL MANAGERS, WHO APPARENTLY DID NOT CREATE OR MAINTAIN THE APPROPRIATE RECORDS AS REQUIRED BY FINRA. MCGUIRE DILIGENTLY DISCLOSED HIS TAX LIENS AND PROVIDED THE PROOF OF TIMELY PAYMENT / RESOLUTION. MCGUIRE HAS ENGAGED COMPETENT LEGAL COUNSEL AND IS IN THE PROCESS OF RESPONDING TO THESE ALLEGATIONS AND SHOWING THAT THEY ARE ALL WITHOUT ANY MERIT. UPON PROVING THESE ALLEGATIONS TO BE FALSE AND MISLEADING, MCGUIRE WILL SEEK THE EXPUNGEMENT OF THIS ERRONEOUS INFORMATION FROM HIS EMPLOYMENT RECORDS.