Initiated By
FINRA
Allegations
FINRA BY-LAWS ARTICLE V, SECTION 2, FINRA BY-LAWS ARTICLE V, SECTION 3, FINRA RULES 2010, 8210, NASD RULES 1017(K), 1021, 1022(B), 1031, 2110, 3010(A)(7), 3010(B), 3011(C), 3012, 3070(A)(4), 3070(A)(5), 3070(A)(10), 3070(B): WHILE HIS REGISTRATIONS WERE REVOKED, HOLLAND ENGAGED IN ACTIVITIES, WHICH REQUIRE REGISTRATION. A REVIEW OF HOLLAND'S MEMBER FIRM'S GENERAL LEDGER, LEASE CONTRACTS, BANK STATEMENTS, AND OTHER FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS INDICATED THE FIRM'S FAILURE TO MAKE AND KEEP CURRENT LEDGERS REFLECTING ALL PAID EXPENSES. HOLLAND DID NOT ESTABLISH AN EXPENSE SHARING AGREEMENT WITH AN INSURANCE AGENCY, WITH WHICH THE FIRM SHARED OFFICE SPACE, AND FAILED TO MAKE AND KEEP RECORDS REFLECTING ALL EXPENSES PAID ON BEHALF OF THE FIRM, SUCH AS RENT PAYMENTS, UTILITY EXPENSES, AND PHONE AND/OR CELLULAR PHONE EXPENSES. HOLLAND PAID SOME RENT EXPENSES VIA CASHIER'S CHECK AND FAILED TO MAKE A CORRESPONDING JOURNAL ENTRY FOR THESE RENT PAYMENTS ON THE FIRM'S GENERAL LEDGER. HOLLAND CAUSED HIS FIRM TO VIOLATE THE NET CAPITAL RULE BY CONDUCTING A SECURITIES BUSINESS AND FAILING TO MAINTAIN AT LEAST $250,000 IN NET CAPITAL. THE FIRM'S OBLIGATION TO MAINTAIN THE NET CAPITAL OCCURRED BECAUSE THE FIRM HELD CUSTOMERS' STOCK CERTIFICATES AND FAILED TO TIMELY FORWARD THEM TO THE FIRM'S CLEARING FIRM. HOLLAND FILED FOCUS REPORTS WHICH WERE INACCURATE. HOLLAND FAILED TO COMPLY WITH SEC RULE 17A-11 TO PROMPTLY SEND NOTICE OF THE FIRM'S NET CAPITAL DEFICIENCY. HOLLAND FILED INACCURATE AND UNTIMELY AMENDMENTS TO FORMS U4 INVOLVING HIMSELF. THE INFORMATION CONCERNING THE U4 AMENDMENTS IN EACH OF THE INSTANCES WAS MATERIAL, AND HOLLAND'S INACCURATE AND UNTIMELY AMENDMENTS TO FORMS U4 IN EACH OF THE INSTANCES WERE WILLFUL. HOLLAND FAILED TO FILE PART IIA OF FORM X-17A-5 IN CONNECTION WITH THE FIRM'S SUSPENSION FOR FAILING TO PAY ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FEES, AND HAS FAILED TO FILE PART IIA OF FORM X-17A-5 IN CONNECTION WITH THE FIRM'S SUSPENSION FOR FAILING TO FILE AN ANNUAL AUDIT. HOLLAND, ACTING ON BEHALF OF HIS FIRM, FAILED TO PROVIDE AN INITIAL AND AN ANNUAL PRIVACY NOTICE TO THE FIRM'S CUSTOMERS FOR THREE YEARS. HOLLAND CAUSED THE FIRM TO VIOLATE REGULATION S-P, IN VIOLATION OF NASD RULE 2110. HOLLAND ALSO FAILED TO ADOPT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES THAT ADDRESS THE PROTECTION OF CUSTOMER INFORMATION AND RECORDS. HOLLAND FAILED TO PROVIDE FOR AN ANNUAL INDEPENDENT TEST OF THE FIRM'S ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING COMPLIANCE PROGRAM FOR TWO YEARS. FOR A YEAR AND FOUR MONTHS, HOLLAND FAILED TO ENSURE THAT THE FIRM MAINTAINS AND REVIEW CORRESPONDENCE, INCLUDING ELECTRONIC MAIL CORRESPONDENCE, SENT TO AND FROM THE FIRM. HOLLAND FAILED TO ENSURE THAT ALL OF THE FIRM'S REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES ATTENDED THE FIRM'S ANNUAL COMPLIANCE MEETINGS. HOLLAND FAILED TO REPORT CRIMINAL HISTORY RELATING TO ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL ASSOCIATED WITH THE FIRM; THAT HE HAD BEEN SUSPENDED DURING A PERIOD; THAT THE FIRM HAD BEEN SUSPENDED DURING A PERIOD; A CUSTOMER COMPLAINT THAT HAD BEEN RECEIVED BY THE FIRM. HOLLAND RECEIVED NOTICE OF THESE EVENTS BUT FAILED TO FILE A RULE 3070 REPORT WITHIN 10 BUSINESS DAYS OF LEARNING OF THE EVENTS. FOR THREE YEARS, HOLLAND FAILED TO EVIDENCE THAT THE FIRM HAD CONDUCTED SUPERVISORY REVIEWS OF THE FIRM'S PRODUCING MANAGERS. HOLLAND FAILED TO ENSURE THAT THE FIRM SUBMITTED A RULE 3012 REPORT TO THE FIRM'S SENIOR MANAGEMENT FOR 2006 AND 2007. HOLLAND FAILED TO PROVIDE FINRA WITH ANNUAL NOTIFICATION THAT THAT THE FIRM WAS RELYING ON THE LIMITED SIZE AND RESOURCES EXCEPTION, AND HOLLAND FILED THE FIRM'S 2008 ANNUAL NOTIFICATION TO FINRA NINE WEEKS LATE. HOLLAND, AS THE FIRM'S MANAGING DIRECTOR, FAILED TO SUBMIT A REPORT BY THE REQUIRED DATE; HOLLAND FILED THE FIRM'S FIRST REPORT TWO YEARS AFTER THE REQUIRED DATE; MOREOVER, HOLLAND FAILED TO ADEQUATELY DISCUSS SPECIFIC AREAS DESCRIBED BY RULE 3012 IN THE REPORT. BY LETTER DATED DECEMBER 16, 2004, FINRA INFORMED HOLLAND THAT HIS PURCHASE OF THE FIRM HAD BEEN DENIED; (CONT. IN COMMENT)
Resolution
Decision & Order of Offer of Settlement
Bar
Bar (Permanent)
Registration Capacities Affected
All Capacities
Start Date
4/27/2012
Regulator Statement
HE WAS ALSO INFORMED THAT HE HAD SIXTY DAYS WITHIN WHICH TO FILE A FORM BDW OR UNWIND HIS PURCHASE TRANSACTION. FROM FEBRUARY 16, 2005 THROUGH OCTOBER 26, 2009, HOLLAND HAS REPEATEDLY AND FALSELY REPRESENTED TO FINRA THAT HE HAD UNWOUND THE APRIL 2004 PURCHASE TRANSACTION. HOLLAND PROVIDED INCOMPLETE AND UNTIMELY RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION BY FINRA. WITHOUT ADMITTING OR DENYING THE ALLEGATIONS, HOLLAND CONSENTED TO THE DESCRIBED SANCTION AND TO THE ENTRY OF FINDINGS; THEREFORE HE IS BARRED FROM ASSOCIATION WITH ANY FINRA MEMBER IN ANY CAPACITY FOR VIOLATING FINRA BY-LAWS ARTICLE V, SECTION 2, FINRA BY-LAWS ARTICLE V, SECTION 3, FINRA RULES 2010, 8210, NASD RULES 1017(K), 1021, 1022(B), 1031, 2110, 3010(A)(7), 3010(B), 3011(C), 3012, 3070(A)(4), 3070(A)(5), 3070(A)(10), 3070(B). HOLLAND, ACTING IN THE CAPACITY OF HIS MEMBER FIRM'S MANAGING DIRECTOR, ACTED IN A CAPACITY REQUIRING REGISTRATION WITH FINRA DESPITE THE FACT THAT HE WAS SUSPENDED IN A PRINCIPAL CAPACITY AND HIS FINRA REGISTRATIONS WERE REVOKED. HOLLAND WAS ADVISED THAT HIS REGISTRATIONS WERE REVOKED, ACKNOWLEDGED THAT HE RECEIVED THE FINRA INFORMATION ON THE MATTER. HOLLAND FILED INACCURATE AND UNTIMELY AMENDMENTS TO FORMS U4 INVOLVING HIMSELF. THE INFORMATION CONCERNING THE U4 AMENDMENTS IN EACH OF THE INSTANCES WAS MATERIAL, AND HOLLAND'S INACCURATE AND UNTIMELY AMENDMENTS TO FORMS U4 WERE WILLFUL VIOLATIONS. HOLLAND FAILED TO FILE PART IIA OF FORM X-17A-5 IN CONNECTION WITH TWO SEPARATE SUSPENSIONS OF HIS FIRM. HOLLAND CAUSED THE FIRM TO VIOLATE REGULATION S-P. HOLLAND, ACTING ON BEHALF OF HIS FIRM, FAILED TO PROVIDE AN INITIAL AND AN ANNUAL PRIVACY NOTICE TO THE FIRM'S CUSTOMERS, AND HE ALSO FAILED TO ADOPT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES THAT ADDRESS THE PROTECTION OF CUSTOMER INFORMATION AND RECORDS. HOLLAND FAILED TO PROVIDE FOR AN ANNUAL INDEPENDENT TEST OF THE FIRM'S ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING COMPLIANCE PROGRAM. HOLLAND FAILED TO ENSURE THAT THE FIRM REVIEW AND MAINTAIN CORRESPONDENCE, INCLUDING ELECTRONIC MAIL CORRESPONDENCE, SENT TO AND FROM THE FIRM. HOLLAND FAILED TO ENSURE THAT ALL OF THE FIRM'S REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES ATTENDED THE FIRM'S ANNUAL COMPLIANCE MEETINGS. HOLLAND FAILED TO REPORT MATERIAL INFORMATION HISTORY RELATING TO ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL ASSOCIATED WITH THE FIRM; FAILED TO REPORT THAT HE HAD BEEN SUSPENDED; FAILED TO REPORT TWICE THAT HIS FIRM HAD BEEN SUSPENDED; FAILED TO REPORT A CUSTOMER COMPLAINT THAT HAD BEEN RECEIVED BY THE FIRM ON OR ABOUT A CERTAIN DATE. HOLLAND RECEIVED NOTICE OF THESE EVENTS BUT FAILED TO FILE A RULE 3070 REPORT WITHIN 10 BUSINESS DAYS OF LEARNING OF THE EVENTS. FOR THREE YEARS, HOLLAND FAILED TO EVIDENCE THAT THE FIRM HAD CONDUCTED SUPERVISORY REVIEWS OF THE FIRM'S PRODUCING MANAGERS. HOLLAND FAILED TO ENSURE THAT THE FIRM SUBMITTED A RULE 3012 REPORT TO THE FIRM'S SENIOR MANAGEMENT FOR TWO YEARS. HOLLAND FAILED TO PROVIDE FINRA WITH ANNUAL NOTIFICATION THAT THAT THE FIRM WAS RELYING ON THE LIMITED SIZE AND RESOURCES EXCEPTION, AND HE FILED A LATE ANNUAL NOTIFICATION TO FINRA FOR THE FIRM. HOLLAND, AS THE FIRM'S MANAGING DIRECTOR, FAILED TO SUBMIT A REPORT BY THE REQUIRED DATE; HOLLAND FILED THE FIRM'S FIRST REPORT TWO YEARS AFTER THE REQUIRED DATE; MOREOVER, HOLLAND FAILED TO ADEQUATELY DISCUSS SPECIFIC AREAS FOR THE REPORT. HOLLAND VIOLATED FINRA CONTINUING MEMBERSHIP RULE. HOLLAND MADE A FORM BD FILING CHANGING THE NAME OF THE BROKER-DEALER FOR TAKING CONTROL OF THE FIRM. HOWEVER, FINRA INFORMED HOLLAND THAT HIS PURCHASE OF THE FIRM HAD BEEN DENIED; HE WAS ALSO INFORMED THAT HE HAD SIXTY DAYS WITHIN WHICH TO FILE A FORM BDW OR UNWIND HIS PURCHASE TRANSACTION. NEVERTHELESS, HOLLAND REPEATEDLY AND FALSELY REPRESENTED TO FINRA THAT HE HAD UNWOUND THE PURCHASE TRANSACTION. HOLLAND PROVIDED INCOMPLETE AND UNTIMELY RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTS BY FINRA.